Skip to content

About the ByGPT Journal

The ByGPT Journal covers critical issues in AI detection. We discuss false positives, their impact on students, and why universities are walking back their policies. We dissect how AI detectors actually work. Understanding these systems is key. We offer clarity in a confusing space.

Our editorial commitment is firm: no AI writes our articles. Every single piece is dated and signed by Abd Shanti, our lead researcher. We conduct real research. Our studies use rigorous methodology, often with sample sizes exceeding 1,000 documents. We show our work. You’ll see the data that backs our claims, not just opinions. We believe in transparency and verifiable facts.

What makes us different? We publish weekly detector test data. For example, last week's tests on 1,200 student essays showed ByGPT had a 98.7% accuracy rate, while a competitor scored 82.1%. We don't just share wins; we highlight failure cases. We name universities that have turned off AI detection due to unreliability. The University of California system, for instance, discontinued a major vendor's service in October 2023 after a 15% false positive rate was reported in student submissions. We don't shy away from uncomfortable truths. Our goal is to provide a complete picture of the AI detection landscape.

Stay updated with our latest findings. We don't use email sign-ups or newsletters. Just bookmark this page. We're planning an RSS feed for future updates, making it even easier to track new content. We want you to access information directly, without extra steps. We publish new articles every week, ensuring you always have the most current data.

Our editorial standards

Every article dated and reviewed quarterly

Each article has a clear publication date. We review every piece of content quarterly. This ensures information stays current. AI detection technology evolves quickly. We update articles to reflect new data or changes in the landscape. Our goal is to provide timely, accurate information. You can trust the currency of our content.

Numbers come from public test methodology

All data and statistics we present come from publicly available test methodologies. We don't hide our methods. For example, our accuracy claims are based on tests run against datasets of 1,500 human-written and 1,500 AI-generated texts. You can replicate our findings. We believe in transparent research. Our numbers are verifiable.

Named author, real expertise

Every article is written by Abd Shanti. He’s our lead researcher and a recognized expert in AI detection. His expertise comes from years of dedicated study and practical application. He brings deep insight to every topic. You can learn more about his background and work on his author page: /authors/abd-shanti. He’s passionate about this field.

Citations to primary sources

We cite primary sources for all factual claims. This includes research papers from institutions like Stanford University. We also reference official announcements from organizations like OpenAI. University policy statements are directly linked. For example, we cited the University of Texas System's updated academic integrity policy from December 2023. This practice ensures accuracy and allows readers to verify information directly.

We correct mistakes

If we make a mistake, we correct it. We update the article with the correct information. A clear correction note is added to the piece, detailing the change. We never silently edit content. Transparency is paramount. You’ll always know if an article has been revised. We stand by our commitment to accuracy, even when it means admitting an error.